What is the Applicant's primary technology business operations (Software / Hardware / Services)?
This answer determines which liability model the underwriter applies, and the three categories fail in very different ways.
What the carrier is actually asking
The carrier is asking whether your primary activity is producing software, supplying hardware, or delivering services. Most technology businesses do more than one, so the question is really about the revenue split.
Why it is underwritten
Software defects propagate to every customer at once. Hardware carries product liability and recall exposure. Services carry professional liability tied to individual engagements. The rating basis and the wording differ, so the classification determines what you are actually buying.
Where the answer lives in Microsoft 365, Entra ID, and Azure
This is a description of your business supported by revenue attribution.
| Platform | Where the setting lives | What has to be true |
|---|---|---|
| Finance | Revenue split across software, hardware, and services | A supportable split rather than an impression. Attested |
| Contracts | What customers actually contract for | The contractual characterisation, which sometimes differs from the commercial description |
| Delivery | Whether software is hosted by you or installed by the customer | Hosting changes the exposure substantially, because availability becomes your obligation |
| Trajectory | Where revenue is shifting | A business moving from licence to hosted service is changing its risk profile |
| Policy | The description on the schedule | Consistency with what you describe here |
A software company that hosts its product has taken on availability and data custody obligations that a licence vendor never had. Describing yourself purely as software understates that, and it is the part most likely to generate a client claim.
What a defensible yes requires
- The primary activity reflects the revenue split.
- Secondary activities are disclosed.
- Hosting and data custody obligations are described where they exist.
- Any significant shift in the mix is mentioned.
- The policy schedule description matches.
How this answer goes wrong
A company describes itself as software while a third of revenue comes from implementation consultancy. Professional services claims arise from engagements rather than from the product, and that revenue was not part of the rating basis.
Frequently asked
What if we do all three?
Give the split. Carriers handle mixed technology businesses routinely when they can see the proportions.
Does hosting change the answer?
It adds a service dimension with availability obligations. Describe it explicitly.
Why does the split matter?
It determines the rating basis and which wording extensions you need. A misclassification can leave the largest revenue line poorly covered.
What if the mix is changing?
Say so. A business moving toward hosted delivery is worth flagging at the renewal where the shift crosses over.
Related questions
Stop answering this from memory
Connect Microsoft 365, Entra ID, and Azure read-only. Insurance Posture reads the live configuration behind each application answer and shows you which ones you can prove before you sign.
Assess your posture